From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 09:20:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8740C1065670 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732448FC12; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.solomo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8M9Kv4j064659; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:20:57 GMT (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4E7AFDF8.2030308@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:20:56 +0200 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0a1) Gecko/20110919 Thunderbird/9.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4E7083D7.90308@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E7087B9.7050502@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E7AF2AA.2010600@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E7AF2AA.2010600@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: rt-4.0.2 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:20:58 -0000 On 22.09.2011 10:32, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>>> This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so >>>> I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar >>>> archives of all four from: >>>> >>>> http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/rt40.html > >> Ah. Apparently the three additional perl modules were added to the >> ports on 1st September. I'll update the rt40 shar shortly. > > My thanks to all those who have sent feedback so far. A couple of > issues have been fixed, and I think it's now time to send-pr. > > One question: committers -- would you prefer this as a .shar for a new > www/rt40 port, or as a diff against www/rt38 and repo-copy to www/rt40? > Please send it as a diff against rt38, as we'll do a repo copy. Thanks, Florian