Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 23:42:11 -0600 From: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: empty lists in for Message-ID: <20000305234210.A4990@holly.calldei.com> In-Reply-To: <57223.952177003@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002212205230.36736-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> <57223.952177003@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, March 04, 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Neither bash nor ksh claim to be particularly POSIX compliant. our
> /bin/sh does.
ksh doesn't claim to be POSIX compliant?
"ksh is intended to conform to the Shell Language Standard
developed by the IEEE POSIX 1003.2 Shell and Utilities Language
Committee."
-- http://www.kornshell.com/info/
And on a FreeBSD-compiled binary of the real AT&T ksh code:
$ echo ${.sh.version}
Version M 1993-12-28 i
$ for i in ; do echo $i; done
$
--
|Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
|Breakthrough: It nearly booted on the first try.
`------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000305234210.A4990>