From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 25 09:33:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA00728 for current-outgoing; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.serv.net (mx.serv.net [199.201.191.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00722; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MindBender.serv.net by mx.serv.net (8.7.5/SERV Revision: 2.30) id JAA24070; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.serv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA09094; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610251633.JAA09094@MindBender.serv.net> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.serv.net: Host michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger), scrappy@ki.net, current@freebsd.org, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendations... In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 25 Oct 96 08:28:27 -0700. <199610251528.IAA10067@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:33:41 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [...] >> quite tempted. Only the low memory bandwidth of the Natoma chipset >> (compared to the Triton HX chipset) has made me hesitate. The low memory bandwidth problem was on the _ORION_, not the Natoma. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------