Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:20:08 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Message-ID: <200003300120.RAA95783@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: 29 Mar 2000 17:10:27 -0800 * From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> * product). So, I'm puting the IS_INTERACTIVE there and ignore * the portlint's coercing about it :) NO_CDROM or NO_PACKAGE are * not needed, which is good :) As I say on the error logs page, you might not realize it but IS_INTERACTIVE is actually stronger than all the NO_*s combined, since I no longer have time to fetch and build IS_INTERACTIVE packages manually. If you set IS_INTERACTIVE, you can pretty much assume the distfile or package won't show up anywhere on the FTP site or CDROMs. By the way, if it's only for the license, why don't you do it in the REQ script? (Look at editors/e93). Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003300120.RAA95783>