From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 10:54:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FCC16A4CE; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:54:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21EA43FFD; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:54:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAIIqPMg094083; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:52:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hAIIqPoG094080; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:52:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:52:25 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <20031118103822.C64472@root.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Alexey Dokuchaev cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/nologin nologin.8 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:54:34 -0000 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > The bikeshed is not over until the "late reply to an early message > indicating the discussion should be started all over again" happens. > Therefore, this bikeshed is over. FWIW, I think we should start a new bikeshed, because I'm having trouble finding the old one. As far as I can tell, the conversation went: Hmm. Dynamic linking for nologin might raise security concerns, I'll update the man page. Why not statically link? Because it's a shell script. Maybe we should just make it a binary. Ok, I've committed it. Wait, I have a version I've been maintaining in ports that's a bit more featureful, perhaps we should commit that? So it sounds like there's lots of room for refinement, no real objection to refinement, but since we've just entered a code freeze, any refinement should be carefully discussed with re@. :-) Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories