From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 29 07:10:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47C216A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au (cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au [134.7.165.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1720543D2D for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:10:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au) Received: from cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au (localhost.dssrg.curtin.edu.au [127.0.0.1])i2TFAVGB024723 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:10:31 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from root@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au) Received: (from root@localhost)i2TFAVKa024722 for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:10:31 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:10:31 +0800 From: Charlie Root To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040329151031.GA24674@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> References: <200403290441.i2T4fscK023387@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> <1080562783.3107.9.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080562783.3107.9.camel@chaucer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Mainframe support X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:10:56 -0000 On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:19:43AM -0500, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 23:41, Charon wrote: > > IBM is currently pushing Linux on its big iron offerings. What similar > > IBM implemented its VM Operating system many years ago. It is capable of > running guest operating systems that "believe" they are running on a I was just curious. A local news site zdnet.au posted a story about Centrelink (large IT user in Australia) stalling Linux deployment because of SCO FUD. Someone mentioned that BSD couldn't be used because it couldn't run on a mainframe so I figured I would ask. > MVS. VM can run many copies of Linux simultaneously. I am not sure it > is quite fair to call this a "smoke and mirrors" port. I wasn't dissing IBM :-), shouldave used a different term.