From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Dec 26 23:02:19 1994
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id XAA09836 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 23:02:19 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA09830 for <QUESTIONS@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 1994 07:02:14 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA18017; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 22:55:53 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: time.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: TAM SIU CHUNG <94650499@cityu.edu.hk>
cc: QUESTIONS@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: XFree86 3.1 problem 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Dec 94 13:29:19 +0800."
             <01HL51K3FJ1G8WWHH5@cityu.edu.hk> 
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 1994 22:55:52 -0800
Message-ID: <18016.788511352@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	I have recently brought your FreeBSD 2.0 and I can sucessfully install
> it into my machine. It can boot right from it and nothing special happened bu
t
> when I change the directory into /usr/X11R6/bin, all the binary modules seeme
d
> to be installed but was under certain access protection. We can I do to deal
> with this ?

I'm sorry, but I simply don't understand the question, at least not as
phrased.  Could you kindly elaborate on the nature of your problem?
I've run XFree86 3.1 from the CD without any problems, myself.

					Jordan