From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Mar 31 2:10: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9EB37B7C1 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id CAA90116; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:10:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003311010.CAA90116@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/16271 Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/16271; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Jin Guojun (FTG staff) Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/16271 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:00:59 +0200 On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 21:44:22 PST, Jin Guojun wrote: > This problem also exists in 4.0 release. The patch is very simple, > and the concept is clear. Can we fix this problem with apply the > following patch? I don't think so, because that file is on the vendor branch. This fix should be submitted to keith Bostic, nvi's maintainer. If he agrees that the next release of nvi will include this patch exactly, then we can probably do some magic. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message