From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 05:02:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917C416A4CF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 05:02:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F343D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 05:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0351eCB021906; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:01:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:01:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20050102.220156.79545944.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bfoz@bfoz.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <40170.4.248.235.201.1104333403.squirrel@4.248.235.201> References: <40170.4.248.235.201.1104333403.squirrel@4.248.235.201> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ucom and sio X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 05:02:19 -0000 In message: <40170.4.248.235.201.1104333403.squirrel@4.248.235.201> "Brandon Fosdick" writes: : Judging from the man page, ucom is limited to acting like a tty with no : support for sio. Is this true? Is there some magic config bit somewhere : that will enable hidden sio support? Ummm, I don't know what you are asking here. ucom supports all the rs232 stuff w/o problem. I use it all the time with my phone to dial into the network. Warner