From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Feb 24 06:59:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BE71514A59 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A453892DD for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1O6xAKC091109 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 07:59:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Recover failed SD card To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2341a9ac-42aa-737e-441f-b69cccc826c6@netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <27081e0e-5aff-095e-f9ae-3144d2485966@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 07:59:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0A453892DD X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.16)[ip: (0.54), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.27), asn: 30722(-0.07), country: IT(0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.985,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.91)[0.910,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.netfence.it]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.35)[0.349,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:59:22 -0000 On 2/23/19 8:47 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Yet, out of desperation, I would try > what we did with failing printed circuit boards: put it for some time in > a freezer (say for 20-40 min), take it out and try to read again. Heat > moderately, I would say to about 90 C (for about 20-40 min), and try to > read it again. I'd be surprised if that worked, but I have nothing to lose I guess. > Next step is paid recovery services, with those stay away from the ones > who charge even for "taking a look", use only those who charge if they > recover most of the stuff. These will be expensive, expect to pay $500 - > $1000. Ask me off the list which ones I know are good just by someone's > I know experience. The cases I know of were hard drives, but some of > them may work with Flash devices as well. I've used such services in the past and I know a good one here in Italy. I'll ask my customer, of course, but I don't think she's willing to pay such an amount. bye & Thanks av.