Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:47:48 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Subject:   Re: web FreeBSD Ports Search is out of sync
Message-ID:  <50BB23C4.7050302@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20121202113214.1341314f@it.tim.tetcu.info>
References:  <50BA347D.9080301@quip.cz> <CAF6rxgkhbOLN3ZZhxRZgYtQWF4yeHjiPS68YryKE-vAqitAvFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1tqH857Ju2C8ADVPYG9VzhJYmY3Rya9fAvP=pcbVvvuRA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7WWSeT-FTD=YBvbBcjhWWSWUbcMjfUiwtwaXYVPW=yZruo8w@mail.gmail.com> <50BB0D7D.6030406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20121202102608.0b091887@it.tim.tetcu.info> <50BB1C64.9010602@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20121202113214.1341314f@it.tim.tetcu.info>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig5AF2A32C8CA42BA0A02B81AA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 02/12/2012 09:32, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> If you're running 2.9 OPTIONSng should be handled correctly.  It
>> > doesn't matter much: the exact format of the OPTIONS variables
>> > doesn't make much difference to building the INDEX, only detecting
>> > when they've been changed.

>  # pkg info p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
> p5-FreeBSD-Portindex-2.9       Incremental FreeBSD ports INDEX file gen=
eration
>=20
> So what exactly are you checking WRT option files?

Basically, just the timestamp on the file.  If it's newer than the last
time cache-update was run, then the corresponding port needs rechecking.

Or if there is a new options file.  The 'unknown options file' error
comes about by comparing the makefiles included from the ports with the
contents of the /var/db/ports directory.

=2E.. and thinking about it, after the benefit of sufficient coffee, it's=

now clear to me that logic is incorrect: it can't distinguish between a
newly created options file and a leftover from a removed port.

Does no harm, but won't work out that because there's a new options file
at least one port needs rechecking, or identify the port(s) to recheck.
 I should fix that.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.

PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk


--------------enig5AF2A32C8CA42BA0A02B81AA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEUEARECAAYFAlC7I8wACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwhnACYkAgbuHrWGn2MNmTkJaZHNWC6
eQCeMop6x4+a3nOHUUsiFzF1G8o6ez4=
=3cCU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig5AF2A32C8CA42BA0A02B81AA--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50BB23C4.7050302>