Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:29:38 +0100 (MEZ)
From:      "Hr.Ladavac" <lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
To:        kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ccd - some measurements
Message-ID:  <199612121529.AA154004578@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
In-Reply-To: <199612120805.JAA25514@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph Kukulies" at Dec 12, 96 09:05:27 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
E-mail message from Christoph Kukulies contained:
> 
> 
> 
> Quantum Atlas 2GB, PPRO-200/256, 32MB
> 
> Bonnie result:
>               -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %CPU
> PPRO      100  5006 43.3  4959 11.3  2290  6.3  5022 43.7  4890  7.0  87.1  1.9
                      ^^^^                             ^^^^
		      These percentages are bad.  Should be higher.  It
		      means that the machine is IO limited even in the
		      per char test which does getchar() and should be
		      CPU limited instead.  This thing needs a faster
		      disk or ccd *badly*
> 
> 
> 
> CCD Amd K5/PR-133, two ncr/pci controllers, 2 Quantum Tempest 3.2 GB (slow)
> 
> I/L
>  8        100  2103 39.5  2118 10.9   828  7.0  2555 39.6  2324 13.6  58.9  4.3
> 12        100  2151 36.7  2160 10.4   968  8.0  3305 50.4  3067 17.0  59.1  4.3
> 10        100  2209 39.4  2231 11.4   934  7.9  2940 45.1  2682 15.2  61.3  4.6
> 18        100  2304 38.1  2290 10.8  1118  9.3  4182 64.4  3899 21.8  60.9  4.2
> 14        100  2415 41.2  2436 12.3  1020  8.7  3568 54.5  3293 18.1  60.5  4.3
> 20        100  2494 41.6  2525 12.0  1158  9.9  4523 68.6  4227 24.2  62.8  4.3
> 22        100  2559 42.0  2580 11.7  1153  9.6  4583 69.9  4527 24.8  64.3  4.4
> 16        100  2749 47.1  2790 13.2  1148  9.7  4150 62.8  3892 21.5  68.0  3.9
> 24        100  2760 45.8  2787 12.8  1197 10.4  4921 74.6  4900 26.9  66.0  4.2
> 26        100  2783 45.8  2814 13.3  1257 10.7  4962 74.9  4734 26.2  63.0  4.1
> 40        100  2853 45.0  2851 12.5  1416 11.5  5465 82.2  5256 28.9  67.3  4.2
> 28        100  2920 48.1  2941 13.7  1283 10.9  5224 79.2  4946 27.5  64.5  4.2
> 48        100  2934 46.5  2959 12.9  1657 13.5  5555 83.9  5340 29.8  67.8  4.0
> 30        100  3094 50.8  3133 14.2  1333 10.9  5370 81.2  5138 27.5  64.3  4.2
> 56        100  3210 51.7  3258 14.6  1737 14.2  5772 87.2  5643 31.2  68.4  4.2
> 32        100  3271 53.3  3322 14.8  1469 12.2  5241 78.7  5067 27.5  68.7  4.0
> 72        100  3552 56.6  3641 16.0  1963 15.9  5829 86.3  5651 29.8  67.7  4.1
> 80        100  3643 57.7  3679 16.1  2102 16.7  6113 90.5  5884 31.5  69.2  4.0
> 64        100  3657 57.8  3669 15.9  2153 17.7  6417 95.2  6430 34.5  69.2  4.1
> 96        100  4312 69.6  4404 19.7  2414 19.5  6359 93.6  6486 34.4  67.8  4.1
                      ^^^^                             ^^^^
		      Getting better.  Okay, it's a slower CPU, but it's 
		      still IO limited in getchar().  You can get some more
		      out of the box.

/Marino
> 
> 
> --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612121529.AA154004578>