From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 18:13:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4016A5A1 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EF813C465 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so5138150uge for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:13:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JZ2f71KY1ViPP3UM/nHSv7FvR5ZvNws59PS4ucsF+84xV/ZGCyulsFRWpVxbG6wGv1oh0+OJSKcZ4fh9zsMNTxS5g7/4Erw0dsXb8WnKNXnFbPxga+NzNo1M1p/Zlj2zrgFsnY+FqTIoJFkJa/08fkceJSMvlfiQrF6vaOa1r48= Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr6703771huf.1168020373572; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.162.12 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:06:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000701051006n278c44b4x9da019f3d8d8275c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:06:13 -0800 From: "pete wright" To: "Eugene Grosbein" In-Reply-To: <20070105180003.GA23331@svzserv.kemerovo.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070105174350.GA21615@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <57d710000701050956j36433495v72b62a9404a25a5d@mail.gmail.com> <20070105180003.GA23331@svzserv.kemerovo.su> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:30:36 +0000 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: benchmark X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:13:30 -0000 On 1/5/07, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:56:31AM -0800, pete wright wrote: > > > >Tried to use iperf from ports in UDP mode with 64 byte payload, > > >but it calls gettimeofday() after each write and gives me about 80Kpps only > > >for Pentium D 2.8Ghz. > > > > > >What alternative should I use? May be, a netgraph node? > > > > I've done some benchmarking/testing of 10gig-e NIC's using a combo of > > iperf/netgraph and ttcp with good results. all are available in > > ports. > > What pps numbers had you obtained? What CPU had you used? > I don't like iperf for gettimeofday() overhead. > yea that was an issue, hence us using multiple benchmarks to get a better picture of performance. sorry can't really get into the specifics on the hardware/stat's of the benchmark. used 10gig-e as example to illustrate that all these utilities functioned well under heavy tcp and udp loads. -pete -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group