From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  5 06:58:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3787216A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  5 Jan 2004 06:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wbm2.pair.net (wbm2.pair.net [209.68.3.43])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 936B243D45
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  5 Jan 2004 06:58:29 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 39673 invoked by uid 65534); 5 Jan 2004 14:58:28 -0000
Received: from 158.6.15.27 ([158.6.15.27])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user silby@silby.com)
        by webmail.pair.com with HTTP;
        Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:58:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <53342.158.6.15.27.1073314708.squirrel@webmail.pair.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:58:28 -0500 (EST)
From: <silby@silby.com>
To: <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
X-pair-Authenticated: 158.6.15.27
In-Reply-To: <200401042151.i04Lp27E009737@gw.catspoiler.org>
References: <200401041115.29188.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
        <200401042151.i04Lp27E009737@gw.catspoiler.org>
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 05:22:19 -0800
cc: dejan.lesjak@ijs.si
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: wpaul@FreeBSD.org
cc: ryans@gamersimpact.com
Subject: Re: 5.2-RC oerrs and collisions on dc0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:58:32 -0000

> I just took a closer look at the busdma diff, and this change to
> dc_txeof() looks very suspicious:
>
> -               if (!(cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_LASTFRAG) ||
> +               if (!(cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_FIRSTFRAG) ||
>                     cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_SETUP) {

I'm current checking e-mail via a webmail interface and I haven't had time
to check over your later posts, but I thought I'd note that the change
above _is_ busdma related; one subtle change in the busdma code was that
the mbuf is now linked to the first fragment in the chain, whereas before
it was linked to the last fragment.  So, the change does make sense on the
surface, although I wouldn't be surprised if it broke something subtle.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack