From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 22:10:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533716A46C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bst2006@dva.dyndns.org) Received: from staeblow.de (pd95b773c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.119.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB5513C455 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bst2006@dva.dyndns.org) Received: from [10.0.0.12] (tmpdva [10.0.0.12]) by staeblow.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112E722E4D; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46633B27.50601@dva.dyndns.org> From: "Boris S." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pascal Hofstee References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:15:33 +0000 Cc: current Subject: Re: ZFS vs Samba Debugging Results ... Need Help. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:10:25 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:05:27 +0200 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:10:25 -0000 Pascal Hofstee schrieb: > It looks like somehow gcc optimized out the actual assignment of dname ! FYI: Since I've compiled Samba with gcc 4.2.1 (from ports) samba works fine with ZFS shares! Boris