From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 1 02:06:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B1116A41B for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7449313C48D for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.68.11]) by digger1.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l711u7Un017916 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:26:07 +0930 (CST) Received: from ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au) by ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.9) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:36:44 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au ([203.6.60.208]) by ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:36:43 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7126NK6037873 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:06:23 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: (from wilkinsa@localhost) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l7126NDN037872 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:06:23 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:06:23 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070801020623.GK37494@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20070801014957.GH37494@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <46AFE7A1.9000800@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46AFE7A1.9000800@delphij.net> Organisation: Defence Science Technology Organisation User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2007 02:06:43.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B98B5C0:01C7D3E0] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1526-5.0.1021-15334.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No-1.377800-0.000000-31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: /dev/gzero vs /dev/zero X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:06:51 -0000 0n Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:53:37AM +0800, LI Xin wrote: >Wilkinson, Alex wrote: >> Why would I use one over the other ? > >No, gzero is used with geom_zero and you should not use it directly. Huh ? I know this ? But why would one use gzero and not /dev/zero ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.