Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:19:22 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r40970 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmY2s79rTi8=2uOif2Oq3r0mN1bAZE2JSgV51tKwmFgjA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <511CF790.7040804@FreeBSD.org> References: <201302141435.r1EEZsXu042558@svn.freebsd.org> <511CF790.7040804@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 February 2013 09:41, Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> wrote: > Pietro Cerutti ha scritto: >> If a port insists on linking <literal>-lpthread</literal> >> + directly, patch it to use <literal>-pthread</literal>.</para> > > Why bother? Because a program that uses pthreads *must* use -pthread to both compile and link and not use -lpthread. That it happens to work is an implementation detail not be relied upon. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmY2s79rTi8=2uOif2Oq3r0mN1bAZE2JSgV51tKwmFgjA>