Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:04:04 +0900
From:      itojun@itojun.org
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: odd xxget() in some network drivers 
Message-ID:  <19050.869807044@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>'s message of Thu, 24 Jul 1997 21:39:05 -0700. <199707250439.VAA16721@implode.root.com>
References:  <199707250439.VAA16721@implode.root.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>	???? I did not write MHLEN <= len.  Why len>MHLEN and MHLEN<len
>>	should result in different situation?
>   Sorry, brain fart. You're correct...there's a reason why we write it the
>other way: so people like me don't get confused. :-)

	hmm, I see.

>>	I prefer that too, however only very few people seems to check
>>	problem reports in a regular basis... I do need to wait almost
>>	forever.  <sigh>
>   In this case it's better to contact the author of the driver(s) directly.
>Non-bug reports are easily ignored otherwise.

	The problem makes it very hard to implement ipsec protocol handling
	routine, so I raised this question.

itojun



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19050.869807044>