Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 08:53:02 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <19981203085302.B1209@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 03:43:50PM -0800 References: <19981203002629.A26879@klemm.gtn.com> <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 03:43:50PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Could the people you mention evaluate KAME on a 2.2.7 system ? > > Or could perhaps a dialogue between those people and KAME > > developers help to do the right decision ? I personally don't > > know people using IPsec... > > I'm not really interested in what it does on 2.2.7, to be perfectly > honest. It's good that the old releases be supported, don't > misunderstand me, but 3.0 is the future and if it's not running in > -current then it's just not a candidate for merging to that branch, > for the obvious reasons. Fully agreed. Fortunately KAME is available for -current as well. I only assumed that those people you mentioned would have 2.2.X systems. But indeed, one should ask the KAME developer, if they would agree to develope on 3.0 and later -current systems. This shouldn't be a problem if think if they would be more involved into the FreeBSD project via commit privs or such. -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981203085302.B1209>