Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:55 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Which "linux emulation" works with which programs or the inverse? Message-ID: <20071025174555.GU2012@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20071025090136.GA1941@freebsd.org> References: <20071024132656.tz1wjruoocg8g8o8@intranet.encontacto.net> <20071025090136.GA1941@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0rpW5bEisVBStM29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:01:36AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > on the state of flash9 in linuxulator... > > I tried to debug it but it's (firefox+flash9) a huge program that > generates like 1.5 million of lines of trace. I spend several hours > staring at that but didn't find anything obvious... I would be more > than happy if someone proved I am stupid and I overlooked something > trivial :) > > now the flash9 work is mostly stalled (on my side) as I have some > personal life issues + I am clueless about how to crack the flash9 > nut. I guess once dtrace is imported to FreeBSD I'll be curious enough > to try it on the flash9 problem.. > > thats how it is :( Did you tried to run the glibc test suite ? --0rpW5bEisVBStM29 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHINZSC3+MBN1Mb4gRAg3rAJoD6p3cRWmNIb23FcpmoRpEgQxd2QCgo6zA 6FoOLRdf0sAYuX8ZYc+lhSc= =lStc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0rpW5bEisVBStM29--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071025174555.GU2012>