From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 13:05:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DF816A422; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27BE43D69; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2HD5PeI076076; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:05:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:05:25 +0200 (EET) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Garance A Drosehn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060317150052.W74062@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060317012428.N52721@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] NetBSD disklabel support for geom_bsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:05:40 -0000 Hello! On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Garance A Drosehn wrote: >> 1) NetBSD people extended partition table to 16 entries vs. >> our 8. That's OK, we have place for 22 entries within >> 512-byte sector for disklabel offset 0, and 18 for >> offset 64 bytes (Alpha's case). > > Minor aside: Dragonfly also has 16 entries in their > disklabel. It'd probably be nice if we could recognize > that, but I have no idea of how much work it would be > to implement that. I would say it's "just" a matter of bumping MAXPARTITIONS up. After that, 1st (easy) part of my patch can go away, but 2nd (main part: converting offsets from absolute to slice-relative and removal those "partitions" which are just aliases for our slices) will still stand. As for me, I'm for MAXPARTITIONS bump. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE