From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 02:04:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0905537B401; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (mailgate.nlsystems.com [62.49.251.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D51943F3F; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 02:04:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (herring.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.2]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7A94IHA086512; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:04:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) From: Doug Rabson To: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <200308091707.h79H7Oi8034909@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200308091707.h79H7Oi8034909@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060506258.76226.0.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 10 Aug 2003 10:04:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/ia64/gen fpgetmask.c fpsetmask.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:04:32 -0000 On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 18:07, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > marcel 2003/08/09 10:07:24 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > lib/libc/ia64/gen fpgetmask.c fpsetmask.c > Log: > o There are 6 trap disable bits in ar.fpsr, not five. Even though we > didn't provide a constant for one of them (non-IEEE denormal trap), > in an attempt to not support it probably, it's not we are left with > the lower 5 bits. I think the intention was to not trap for denorms but to just generate the appropriate denorm result. Obviously I didn't get it right :-)