From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Dec 13 10:36:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA915E993E7 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdports@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ares.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2886B3E4 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:36:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdports@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ares.cloudzeeland.nl (unknown [10.10.10.32]) by ares.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D744F862BA; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (styx.zeeland24.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ares.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5E734F8629C; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check To: Warren Block Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Jos Chrispijn Message-ID: <230a4255-839b-0ff8-9730-c86425ab3d5d@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ares.cloudzeeland.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:36:01 -0000 On 8-12-2017 17:58, Warren Block wrote: > procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the > time.  Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained > replacement that is pretty easy to implement: I know - but I can remember that procmail should be installed also when using Postfix. Might be wrong here... Thanks, Jos