From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 16:33:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CAB16A419 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from ra.egypt.nl (cp268254-a.landg1.lb.home.nl [213.51.103.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE5013C46C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from ra.egypt.nl (localhost.egypt.nl [127.0.0.1]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11990398B6; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:33:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix, from userid 501) id C5304398AB; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:33:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on ra.egypt.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4210D39885; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:33:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46C1D961.8090002@boosten.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:33:37 +0200 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 OpenPGP: url=http://www.boosten.org/content/view/49/47/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000765-1, 08/13/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "Lacayo, Luis F" Subject: Re: Question about failover with ISC DHCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:33:47 -0000 Lacayo, Luis F wrote: > > > HI all, > > > > I am looking to replace my current DHCP server with the ISC. Right now > I have to servers which are working with split scopes. Some of my > schools need over 600 IP's, so I have the school with a 255.255.240.0 > which give them 16 Class C, network, so to avoid conflicts I assign the > 3 lower to one server and the 3 highest to the other. > > > > Now comes the question, in the following section there is a split of > 128. If I give a range of 3 class C's do I set this value to 128 or > (128*# Class C Networks)? > Hi Luis, You don't need to have split scopes with ISC: they synchronize DHCP ACK's (and all other statuses) between each other. Setting up is POC... Peter -- http://www.boosten.org