From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 20 03:04:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F361065672; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01848FC12; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [88.130.223.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0818A11D2; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:04:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B2D9440.4070606@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:04:32 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4B2A52DB.5020602@bsdforen.de> <20091218065728.GC29158@lonesome.com> <4B2B681A.1090908@bsdforen.de> <4B2C888A.6000006@FreeBSD.org> <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de> <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ioquake3 support more platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:04:43 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process >> in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my >> patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set >> until everything works as expected. Than I wrap the whole thing (SVN >> snapshot and my patches) up in a tar.gz and upload it to an ftp server. > > Well then I misunderstood what was proposed, and I apologize for that. > What you described is supported, and some ports are already doing it. I'm really glad this is just a misunderstanding, I was about to panic. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?