From owner-cvs-all  Mon Apr 15 15:58: 6 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EB10637B41B; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (lcl234.zbzoom.net [208.236.36.234])
	by pittgoth.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g3FMvp112650;
	Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:57:51 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from darklogik@pittgoth.com)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:05:46 -0400
From: Tom Rhodes <darklogik@pittgoth.com>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/date date.1
Message-Id: <20020415190546.71b686c7.darklogik@pittgoth.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020416083933.B5911-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <200204151817.g3FIHIv24613@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20020416083933.B5911-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.5)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:47:53 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> 
> > trhodes     2002/04/15 11:17:18 PDT
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     bin/date             date.1
> >   Log:
> >   This is a forced commit, the last commit email was never sent. 
> >   Nit pick about the date(1) manual page, describe which clock is
> >   set.
> >
> >   PR:             35606
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.56      +0 -0      src/bin/date/date.1
> 
> date.1 now gives too much detail.  It says that the CMOS clock is
> updated, but there might not be any CMOS or a clock in it.  What
> actually happens is that ther kernel calls a MD function settodr()
> which normally sets a machine dependent clock.

Ok, you explained that to me, and I want your opinion before I do
anything else.  Would it be ok if CMOS clock is replaced with system or
machine dependent clock?

> 
> Bruce
> 
> 


-- 
Tom (Darklogik) Rhodes
www.FreeBSD.org  -The Power To Serve
www.Pittgoth.com -Pittgoth Discussion Portal
trhodes@{Pittgoth.com, FreeBSD.org}
PGP key by www:
http://www.pittgoth.com/~darklogik/darklogik.key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message