Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 19:16:12 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, Meny Yossefi <menyy@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: irq balancer Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmok9tmuh6ontkE%2BH04AqUuuwbT3nLDGXrOkNAP6rXGiSBQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51911084.60505@vangyzen.net> References: <F2E47A38E4D0B9499D76F2AB8901571A7398576B@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <51911084.60505@vangyzen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... that's what the scheduler is for, right? dynamically assigning interrupt threads to inactive CPUs? Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmok9tmuh6ontkE%2BH04AqUuuwbT3nLDGXrOkNAP6rXGiSBQ>