From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 8 18:50:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from scam.xcf.berkeley.edu (scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E64EE15D1D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:49:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nordwick@scam.xcf.berkeley.edu) Received: (qmail 68464 invoked by uid 27268); 9 Sep 1999 01:49:46 -0000 Message-ID: <19990909014946.68463.qmail@scam.xcf.berkeley.edu> To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: message queues for I/O (usenix paper) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <68462.936841786.1@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 18:49:46 -0700 From: "Jayson Nordwick" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Yes. I don't particularly like some of the things in the paper, >although it does have several good concepts. I have an implementation >that does exactly this, and have a line on two other implementations >that do the same thing (but in a different fashion). Unfortunately, >all of these are somewhat problem-specific and are not a general >solution. > >I've spent some time working on a generic implementation that draws >its ideas from several places. I hope to be in a position where I >can work on this almost full time within a month. >-- >Jonathan > Would you like to share your implementation and the line you have on two other implementation that do the same thing (but in a different fassion)? I (and others I know) would be very interested to know what you have come across and what these other ideas are. -jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message