From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 10 10:25:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E35106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A108FC14 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-164-220.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.164.220]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4C91EDD6; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o0AAPKNn001546; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:20 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Matthias Apitz Message-Id: <20100110112520.92c1de3c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de> References: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: must /compat/linux stay in root-fs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:25:22 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:21:02 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Can I safely move the /compat tu /usr/local/compat and do a symlink to > let point /compat --> /usr/local/compat or is there some reason that > linux-f10 ports put all into /compat in root-fs? I don't see any problem to do so. On my 7 default install, there's /compat@ -> usr/compat, and /usr lives on a separate partition. As long as the symlink is present, it should not be a problem. I see that you're suggestion /usr/local/compat instead of the default /usr/compat - maybe it's worth providing an additional symlink compat@ -> local/compat from within /usr? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...