Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 17:26:31 +0300 (MSK) From: "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Figuring out another port's build directory Message-ID: <199611041426.RAA00598@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <96Nov3.215900pst.177557@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at "Nov 3, 96 09:58:46 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199611040502.IAA03537@nagual.ru> you write: > >Ports tracking -current only, so don't bother to configure them > >for other versions. Why not use hardcode path? > > Because I don't want the vat port to break when someone else upgrades > the gsm port. All gsm-dependent ports should be fixed after gsm update either by ports maintainers or gsm updater. vat not only thing which depends on gsm. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611041426.RAA00598>