From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 14 11:50:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955C137B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D4443F75
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
Received: from pooh.honeypot.net.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net
	[10.0.5.128])
	by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6EIoECp051085;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:50:15 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from kirk@strauser.com)
To: Jonathan <jonathan@sirtis.org.uk>
References: <87k7aljbvb.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
	<3F12E1FE.5070101@sirtis.org.uk>
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:50:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3F12E1FE.5070101@sirtis.org.uk> (jonathan@sirtis.org.uk's
 message of "Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:01:50 +0100")
Message-ID: <873ch9j63g.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
Lines: 29
X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Use linux_base-debian instead of linux_base?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:50:18 -0000

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-07-14T17:01:50Z, Jonathan <jonathan@sirtis.org.uk> writes:

Jonathan,

> Take a look at portupgrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade) which has
> portinstall, which you can use instead of cd /usr/ports/blah/blah && make

I've been using portupgrade for ages, but I hadn't thought about using it to
work around the problem.

> Then you can configure in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf using
> ALT_PKGDEP. The sample in the config says:

>    #   ALT_PKGDEP =3D {
>    #     # If you use apache13-modssl instead of apache13
>    #     'apache-1.3.*' =3D> 'apache+mod_ssl-1.3.*',

I've added this to my pkgtools.conf (and the portupgrade port is the current
version):

  ALT_PKGDEP =3D {
    'linux_base' =3D> 'linux_base-debian'
  }

but it doesn't seem to make a difference.  Do I have to do something to make
portinstall aware of that setting?
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/Evtm5sRg+Y0CpvERAh1JAJ9HT9pBVZCAwaAZKUFLd+zWOkl+4QCfQdFV
E9FkItFbGnxbFa2jASByiRs=
=19IW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--