From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 5 20:57:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CF6106566B for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 20:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FA48FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 20:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id p95KbNj5003651; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:37:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id p95KbNvt003650; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:37:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:37:23 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111005203722.GB2707@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20111004205648.GA19519@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20111005200132.GA29748@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111005200132.GA29748@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Cc: Subject: Re: groff -ms -Tascii (nroff?) strange output X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:57:53 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > The reason for writing to current@ is > that I've one box still on r216048, > where "-c" flag is not required. > Has there been a recent change to groff, > affecting this behaviour? As I recall it, the behavior is also configurable (at the system level). Debian seems to still turn it off. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFOjL//tIqByHxlDocRAr9GAJ4qLn9/wibBiu3rGIREya6MxZStmgCdF4G5 Qz3mrAMM5zsiGRrHzgWrT4c= =7gi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9--