From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  8 08:20:56 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAFF1065670
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Mar 2010 08:20:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EC68FC0C
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Mar 2010 08:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37])
	by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o288Kot6087089
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:50 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9])
	by mail.cicely.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o288Kh3Y008482
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:43 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o288Khnc016293;
	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:43 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id o288KhFZ016292;
	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:43 +0100
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>
Message-ID: <20100308082043.GT11192@cicely7.cicely.de>
References: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de>
	<201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.001,
	BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on spamd.cicely.de
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de
Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:20:56 -0000

On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:00:03PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> 
> <deletes>
> 
> >  It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds.
> >  This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles.
> >  Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are
> >  mostly some instructions longer.
> >  But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200.
> 
> Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user mode?

Would be difficult for me since I have no loader to submit bootflags.
Loader support is definitiv on my wishlist, but that's a another subject.

-- 
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.