From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 3 21:24:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10550B3F; Sun, 3 May 2015 21:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16981D1F; Sun, 3 May 2015 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.133] (vie-91-186-145-235.dsl.sil.at [91.186.145.235]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 977F33F423; Sun, 3 May 2015 17:24:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 23:24:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mathieu Arnold cc: Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r384881 - head/lang/gcc5 In-Reply-To: <5F36179DF773D2601B1DACBA@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <201504272342.t3RNgAnb073128@svn.freebsd.org> <8udd-3trw-wny@FreeBSD.org> <5F36179DF773D2601B1DACBA@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 21:24:55 -0000 On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> From bsd.port.mk, around line 2423. > To disable it, set "MASTER_SITE_BACKUP=" in make.conf or the command line. Thanks for the hint. Indeed I found that an admin had put MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?= http://distcache.freebsd.org/ports-distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR}/ MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE?=${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} MASTER_SITE_LOCAL?= http://distcache.freebsd.org/local-distfiles/%SUBDIR%/ into /etc/make.conf. Usually not a problem, because I tend to be the first touching my ports re new versions. In this case some other port apparently had pulled in "my" tarballs earlier, so the cache was used and the actual logic in lang/gcc5 was not. (I also updated my testing setup so that it will catch such cases.) Gerald