Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:23:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng Message-ID: <4FC68FC0.1010707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/30/2012 3:33 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Folks, when moving forward with optionsng, do we want to convert
> NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES to options everywhere?
Absolutely not. By far the majority of users benefit from installing the
docs and examples. Users who don't want them can continue to do what
they've always done, configure it in make.conf. Adding OPTIONS for these
would only cause confusion.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC68FC0.1010707>