From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 26 02:04:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA22881 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 02:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA22872 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 02:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id SAA05396; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:20:52 +0930 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199606260850.SAA05396@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: BSD V2.2 To: dev@fgate.flevel.co.uk (Developer) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:20:51 +0930 (CST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Developer" at Jun 26, 96 09:29:56 am MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Developer stands accused of saying: > > Following up on my last posting.. Ive been trying to compile the BSD V2.2 > 960612 snap kernel.. Ive found the problems are having are because config > is not generating the ioconf.c and ioconf.h files correctly. Has any ideas > why this could be (The symbol names it is putting in are wrong!)? Firstly, my apologies to you and one other party; I wasn't aware that there'd been another 2.2 SNAP recently (I didn't get my subscription CD?!), the only 9606* SNAP I'd seen was the 2.1-960606 version. Now, to address your question; have you built a new copy of the 'config' program to match the kernel? What you're seeing is a classic symptom of the two being out of sync. > Trefor S. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[