From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 19:26:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C6216A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:26:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D533843D1D for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v30so1667486rnb for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.69 with SMTP id b69mr58630rnf; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:56:28 +0530 From: Subhro To: Benjamin Walkenhorst In-Reply-To: <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040918165741.20d10137.krylon@gmx.net> <200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org> <20040918183953.0666ea91.krylon@gmx.net> <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:26:39 -0000 On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:56:52 +0200, Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:40:30 +0530 > Subhro wrote: > > > cat /etc/make.conf > > ------------------------ > PERL_VER=5.8.2 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.2 > PERL_ARCH=mach > NOPERL=yo > NO_PERL=yo > NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo > > CPUTYPE=athlon-mp > > CFLAGS+= -O2 -pipe > X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg make this CFLAGS=-O -pipe -O2 is known to create more problem than it solves > > But like I said, I think I chose the wrong words - > X.org does not perform poorly, it's just that it sometimes will > use lots of CPU, and I am under the impression it does even more so than > XFree did. > Or is it just my perception kidding me? This could be -O2 Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India