From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue May 19 08:26:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06079 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smgmail.smginc.com ([204.170.177.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA06060 for ; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:26:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from AdamT@smginc.com) Received: from smginc.com (204.170.177.4 [204.170.177.4]) by smgmail.smginc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id K030RKVY; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:26:15 -0400 Received: by smginc.com with Microsoft Mail id <3561BF62@smginc.com>; Tue, 19 May 98 10:20:34 PDT From: Adam Turoff To: "freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Petreley's May NC editorial Date: Wed, 13 May 98 12:11:00 PDT Message-ID: <3561BF62@smginc.com> X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG http://www.ncworldmag.com/ncworld/ncw-05-1998/ncw-05-nextten.html Someone got on Nick Petreley's good side. This month's "Next Ten Minutes" is yet another rant against NT, and the first Open Source OS mentioned is FreeBSD. :-) Any workstation running any version of Unix that supports X11R6, including anything from an UltraSPARC running Solaris to a 386 PC running FreeBSD Sure, it's depicting FreeBSD as a "lowly OS" but it's in the context of all the myriad ways a *NIX box can be administered remotely without a zero administration kit, from a VT100, to a Win95 box with Telnet to a lowly 386 FreeBSD running X. Linux is mentioned later in the article. No news here, but it's a good bit of mention in the press. -- Adam. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message