Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:48:40 -0700 From: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> Cc: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>, FreeBSD-PORTS <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: How to tell when BUILD vs. RUN_DEPENDS is appropriate/more appropriate Message-ID: <20010731094840.A3340@johncoop> In-Reply-To: <20010731093220.A16762@heechee.tobez.org>; from tobez@tobez.org on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 00:32:20 -0700 References: <20010730201214.O82760@johncoop> <20010731093220.A16762@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001.07.31 00:32 Anton Berezin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:12:14PM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > > > Now, LIB_DEPENDS is (usually) pretty easy--if a port needs a library > > that's not already on the system, one is really going to know it when > > the linker fails. But differentiating between a BUILD_DEPENDS and a > > RUN_DEPENDS seems to be a much grayer area. How to resolve this such > > that not only does a port build correctly, but bento doesn't also > > complain about what appears to be the entire tree for python or perl > > not being in the pkg-plist. > > I am not sure I follow you here. Perl is in the base system, is not it? > > \Anton. > -- > May the tuna salad be with you. > Well, take a look at the build logs on bento for dhcpconf--I see nearly the entire directory structure for python1.5 and perl5 being listed as missing for the pkg-plist for the port. I'm trying to understand this, with an aim to: 1) fix it if I can; 2) prevent it from happening on anything I'm responsible for. jmc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010731094840.A3340>