Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:38:04 +1000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread Message-ID: <20030924063804.GE44314@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20030924062111.GC95116@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030924060135.GB95116@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309240204030.2518-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030924062111.GC95116@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ cc trimmed ]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:21:11AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> Well, great. Let's go and fix some ports then, and everybody will be happy :)
> But if this is really the way to go, we probably need some hack to bsd.port.mk
> to make PTHREAD_LIBS standard because otherwise every port that needs a
> threads library needs to have PTHREAD_LIBS hacks.
Yes, to support PTHREAD_LIBS properly in bsd.port.mk, you do need to add
PTHREAD_LIBS=${PTHREAD_LIBS} PTHREAD_CFLAGS=${PTHREAD_CFLAGS}
to CONFIGURE_ENV.
--
John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924063804.GE44314>