From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 11 08:44:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA05918 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 08:44:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from konig.elte.hu (konig.elte.hu [157.181.6.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA05884 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 08:44:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from szoli@cs.elte.hu) Received: from neumann.cs.elte.hu (neumann [157.181.6.200]) by konig.elte.hu (8.8.8/8.8.8/3s) with ESMTP id RAA11256 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:45:33 +0100 Received: from localhost (szoli@localhost) by neumann.cs.elte.hu (8.8.8/8.8.8/1c) with SMTP id RAA31254 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:43:58 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: neumann.cs.elte.hu: szoli owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 17:43:58 +0100 (MET) From: Zoltan Sebestyen To: FreeBSD hackers mailinglist Subject: A Question about FreeBSD and Linux(programming) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have to write an application on Linux that deals with the serial port. I have installed a Redhat besides the FreeBSD(I didn't erase FBSD it'll stay there until the end of the world), but finally gave up to use it. Does anyone(for example Doug White ;-) know if the termio functions (like tcgetattr tcsetattr tcflush tcdrain) behave on FBSD like on Linux? Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sebestyen Zoltan It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up. szoli@digo.inf.elte.hu But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid? MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft Widows To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message