Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:06:30 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE Message-ID: <44B7F946.8060408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200607142201.59511.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200607130024.18047.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200607141300.43547.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <44B7F182.8080009@FreeBSD.org> <200607142201.59511.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> Actually, I didn't mean the prefix that some port installs into would be the
> truble, rather where given port looks for includes, libraries and other files
> from ports that it depends upon.
But that's all part of the same issue. If the port is prefix-clean, than
this won't matter. If it's not, it needs to be fixed, regardless of what the
default values of *BASE are.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44B7F946.8060408>