From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 29 5:34:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from storage-1.netscalibur.it (mail1.netscalibur.it [194.244.215.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEF837B423 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:34:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Received: from dev1.localdomain.net (194.244.229.102) by storage-1.netscalibur.it (5.5.031) id 3B0420AE000175A2; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:32:45 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev1.localdomain.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4TCZUc31199; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:35:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:35:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: To: Kris Kennaway Cc: , Subject: Re: teTeX port In-Reply-To: <20010528225240.B50483@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20010529121655.W1368-100000@dev1.localdomain.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 28 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > built differently (each package wasn't built in its own clean chroot, > leading to conflicts between packages). I recently fixed the latex > port similarly; if it seems to work, the tag can be removed. I tested the teTeX port in its own chrooted environment, and it packages/deinstalls just fine. I'll remove the MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD. -- jimmy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message