Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:18:50 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk Message-ID: <20121010121850.039fb6d2@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi
I noticed that HAVE_GNOME doesn't work properly with
bsd.ports.options.mk yet, so
.include <bsd.port.options.mk>
.if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
# ...
.endif
.include <bsd.port.mk>
won't work, while this
.include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
.if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgnomelibs}!=""
# ...
.endif
.include <bsd.port.post.mk>
does.
AFAIK bsd.port.pre.mk/bsd.port.post.mk should be replaced by
bsd.port.options.mk/bsd.port.mk in the long term, so having this work
or documenting a workaround would help port maintainers who are
in the process of updating the port structure.
Michael
--
Michael Gmelin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121010121850.039fb6d2>