From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 27 00:01:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E08106568F; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E8F8FC08; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (heho.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.184.22]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id n9QNk2XY049171 ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:02 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 165 Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9QNk1AO075048; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: (from arno@localhost) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9QNk0nx075045; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arno) To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: "Arno J. Klaassen" Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9944/Mon Oct 26 22:00:04 2009 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at jchkmail2.jussieu.fr with ID 4AE634BA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4AE634BA.000/134.157.184.22/heho.snv.jussieu.fr/heho.snv.jussieu.fr/ Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:01:31 -0000 Hello, I googled a bit on this question but could not find a clear answer : is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow am a bit waterfearing changing the nfs=E8options which worked great till now. Thank you in advance, regards, Arno