From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  8 11:44:44 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA16299
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 11:44:44 -0800
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA16290
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 11:44:42 -0800
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA00405; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 11:44:39 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA00263; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 11:44:07 -0800
Message-Id: <199511081944.LAA00263@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" <karl@mcs.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Impact of upcoming 2.1 release on the STABLE branch? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 95 13:38:12 CST."
             <m0tDGK4-000IDUC@venus.mcs.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 11:44:07 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>Next question -- is the TELNETD security problem recently reported to us via
>CERT fixed in the current STABLE tree, and if not, when will it be?

   Yes, it's fixed in both -current and -stable and the fix will be in the 2.1
release.

-DG