From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 13 02:18:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA07519
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 02:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abel.pdmi.ras.ru ([194.88.2.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA07499
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from pialkin@localhost) by abel.pdmi.ras.ru (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00968; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:17:06 +0400 (MSD)
From: Alexey Pialkin <pialkin@abel.pdmi.ras.ru>
Message-Id: <199609130917.NAA00968@abel.pdmi.ras.ru>
Subject: Re: ATAPI patch
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:17:06 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: ache@nagual.ru, spblug@tsctube.spb.su, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <13048.842599702@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 13, 96 00:28:22 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I don't sure about anything :) For example - my Panasonic 572B doesn't need
> > any delays at all.But GoldStar does.So i don't realy know which one are 
> > neccessary and which not :( 
> 
> I think what he was wondering was whether you'd managed to make the
> GoldStar work with any *less* delays, e.g. is each and every one of them
> known to be necessary?

Ugh. Got a point. 
Yeah - i think it is possible to stay DELAYs only in atapi_probe() - all others
are not so neccesary.

P.S. sorry for such unended patch - but as i said before it's just a hack to get work CDROM. I hope someone sometime will able to write complet ATAPI driver and we will remeber this prolems just as a nightmare that have passed :)

Alexey Pialkin