From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 16:55:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D06616A41F for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD243D60 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C91388EFB; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55:19 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Frank Laszlo Message-ID: <0CAD779515C871FE2C1AC21E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <43D65689.8050207@vonostingroup.com> References: <6E2E84047A522AA3CF4F3F8D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <43D65689.8050207@vonostingroup.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something wrong with portlint? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:55:22 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:32:09 -0500 Frank Laszlo wrote: > Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I had all sorts of problems with portlint yesterday. I kept getting >> errors that the COMMENT was missing even though it wasn't. I got >> complaints about things being out of order when they weren't. (X is >> in the MAINTAINER section - but it wasn't.) In the end, I had to >> submit the ports even though they wouldn't pass portlint because *I* >> knew they were done correctly (and they worked without errors), not >> because portlint gave its stamp of approval. >> >> Has there been a recent code change that might have caused this? (I'm >> running 5.4 SECURITY on an i386 processor.) >> >> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >> Adjunct Information Security Officer >> University of Texas at Dallas >> AVIEN Founding Member >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ >> > There has been some extensive port framework changes (see -ports > archive) If you send the PR in question, I'd gladly take a look at it > for you. Thanks > There's actually two - 92239 and 92241 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/