Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55:19 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something wrong with portlint? Message-ID: <0CAD779515C871FE2C1AC21E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <43D65689.8050207@vonostingroup.com> References: <6E2E84047A522AA3CF4F3F8D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <43D65689.8050207@vonostingroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:32:09 -0500 Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> wrote: > Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I had all sorts of problems with portlint yesterday. I kept getting >> errors that the COMMENT was missing even though it wasn't. I got >> complaints about things being out of order when they weren't. (X is >> in the MAINTAINER section - but it wasn't.) In the end, I had to >> submit the ports even though they wouldn't pass portlint because *I* >> knew they were done correctly (and they worked without errors), not >> because portlint gave its stamp of approval. >> >> Has there been a recent code change that might have caused this? (I'm >> running 5.4 SECURITY on an i386 processor.) >> >> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) >> Adjunct Information Security Officer >> University of Texas at Dallas >> AVIEN Founding Member >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ >> > There has been some extensive port framework changes (see -ports > archive) If you send the PR in question, I'd gladly take a look at it > for you. Thanks > There's actually two - 92239 and 92241 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0CAD779515C871FE2C1AC21E>