From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 14:29:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC22A10656A5 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from lordcow.org (lordcow.org [41.203.5.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186DB8FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lordcow.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lordcow.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o89ETXjq026245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:29:33 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from lordcow@lordcow.org) Received: (from lordcow@localhost) by lordcow.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o89ETSie026244 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:29:28 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from lordcow) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:29:28 +0200 From: Gareth de Vaux To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100909142928.GA25877@lordcow.org> References: <20100908094050.GA73841@lordcow.org> <20100909125400.GA18723@lordcow.org> <20100909131340.GA75829@icarus.home.lan> <20100909132519.GB21535@lordcow.org> <20100909140224.GA76889@icarus.home.lan> <20100909142226.GA25370@lordcow.org> <20100909142455.GA77677@icarus.home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100909142455.GA77677@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lordcow.org Cc: Subject: Re: MSIX failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:29:42 -0000 On Thu 2010-09-09 (07:24), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't > reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list > might have ideas as to what could cause this. Nope, this's a normal host. I've got securelevel on 1, but doubt that would affect this?